←back to thread

131 points kozika | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.644s | source
Show context
eurleif ◴[] No.44450476[source]
Somewhat related, on YouTube, there's a channel filled with fake police bodycam videos. The most-viewed of these are racially inflammatory, e.g.: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5AkXOkXNd8w

The description of the channel on YouTube claims: "In our channel, we bring you real, unfiltered bodycam footage, offering insight into real-world situations." But then if you go to their site, https://bodycamdeclassified.com/, which is focused on threatening people who steal their IP, they say: "While actual government-produced bodycam footage may have different copyright considerations and may be subject to broader fair use provisions in some contexts, our content is NOT actual bodycam footage. Our videos represent original creative works that we script, film, edit, and produce ourselves." Pretty gross.

replies(4): >>44450603 #>>44450716 #>>44451262 #>>44453653 #
1. moritzwarhier ◴[] No.44453653[source]
The website you link (disgusting people) has apparently changed.

> For Content Thieves (Warning)

> If you are currently using Body Cam Declassified content without [...]

> You are in violation of copyright law and will be subject to legal action

[...]

> We aggressively pursue legal remedies against content theft, including statutory damages of up to $150,000 per infringement under U.S. [...]

> An additional administrative fee of $2,500 per infringing video will be assessed

> We demand all revenue generated from the unauthorized use of our content

> We maintain relationships with copyright attorneys who specialize in digital media infringement

> We recommend removing the infringing content immediately and contacting us regarding settlement options

A paragraph about the videos being fake is still there.

> While actual government-produced bodycam footage may have different copyright considerations and may be subject to broader fair use provisions in some contexts, our content is NOT actual bodycam footage.

> Our videos represent original creative works that we script, film, edit, and produce ourselves.

> As privately created content (not government-produced public records), our videos are fully protected by copyright law and are NOT subject to the same fair use allowances that might apply to actual police bodycam

> The distinction means our content receives full copyright protection as creative works, similar to any other professionally produced video content.

This reminds me of a non-AI content mill business strategy that has been metastasizing for years. People who film homeless people and drug addicts and make whole Insta and Youtube channels monetizing it, either framed at "REAL rough footage from city XY" or even openly mocking helpless people. The latter seems to be more common on TikTok and I'm not watching "original" videos of such shite.

There is a special place in hell for people who do such things and in my opinion, there should be laws with very harsh punishments for the people that "create" this trash and make money from it. When it's about the filming of real people without their consent, we really need some laws that effectively allow to punish people who do this, because the victims are not likely to defend themselves.

And in total, the whole strategy is to worsen societal division and tensions, and feed bad human instincts (voyeurism, superiority complex) in order to funnel money into the pockets of parasites without ethics.

replies(1): >>44458786 #
2. eurleif ◴[] No.44458786[source]
I don't think it's changed. Note that my first quote, claiming it's real bodycam footage, is from the description they wrote for the YouTube channel, not from the site. The second quote, saying it's not actual bodycam footage, is the one from the site, and that's still there.
replies(1): >>44459104 #
3. moritzwarhier ◴[] No.44459104[source]
I'm sorry (head -> table), I simply overlooked this part of your comment:

> But then if you go to their site, https://bodycamdeclassified.com/, which is focused on threatening people who steal their IP

I was on the go and not reading properly, sorry