←back to thread

122 points throw0101b | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
camillomiller ◴[] No.44442592[source]
The fundamental problem I have with this analysis is that it won’t consider a simple assumption: Jack Welch was just better at the capitalism game than others. He didn’t rewrite the written rules, he just didn’t care about the ethic-based unwritten ones. With the decline of historical ideologies, hyper-individualism took over. Welch was just very good at understanding that some invisible boundaries didn’t apply anymore, and that the zeitgeist was shifting in that direction.
replies(8): >>44442732 #>>44442849 #>>44442983 #>>44442987 #>>44443168 #>>44443683 #>>44443774 #>>44445728 #
bryanrasmussen ◴[] No.44445728[source]
>he just didn’t care about the ethic-based unwritten ones.

what a man! Sorry, but while I claim no great ethical or moral standing myself I do dislike anything that smacks of applauding their absence in others.

replies(1): >>44453222 #
1. camillomiller ◴[] No.44453222[source]
Applauding? LOL who is doing that? A person like Welch should be in jail