←back to thread

149 points A_D_E_P_T | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.69s | source
Show context
eddythompson80 ◴[] No.44450865[source]
I'll have to bookmark it for later to spend more time than just skimming, but I find 2 things interesting. The lack of any Egyptian archeologists on most interesting and significant findings about Ancient Egypt is one. The other is the seemingly strong conclusion that Ancient Egyptians did in fact move to Egypt from Mesopotamian which is pretty cool.

Egyptians don't like the notion that "they moved there from somewhere". They claim their own unique, uninterrupted, history and connection to the land as well as their civilizational independence from Mesopotamian, Asia Minor, Europe, and Africa.

It's also the same you rarely find Egyptian archeologists/scholars on scientific papers. While this might be a matter of ancient history and science to everyone, it's a matter of current day politics for Egyptians and especially the Egyptian government. The "findings" of the paper has to agree with the narrative built and proposed by the ministry of antiquities or they will literally charge whoever publishes it with a national crime.

replies(18): >>44451004 #>>44451019 #>>44451037 #>>44451074 #>>44451130 #>>44451245 #>>44451366 #>>44451932 #>>44452191 #>>44452447 #>>44452572 #>>44452575 #>>44453486 #>>44454027 #>>44454669 #>>44455890 #>>44458266 #>>44461002 #
NL807 ◴[] No.44451074[source]
>The lack of any Egyptian archeologists on most interesting and significant findings about Ancient Egypt is one.

It seems like Egyptian archaeologists is a clique of academics that do not like to rock the apple cart and go against established ideas about Egyptian history. There is a lot of gate keeping going on, mostly in part of Zahi Hawass, a narcissist that likes to self insert into every research into the subject, and control publication of results, etc. Even worse, claim attribution for work he's not even part of. So, if you don't kiss the ring, or dare to challenge ideas without his blessing, you'll be pretty much become a pariah that will never access archaeological sites again. Because of this, research in the field seems to be stagnant.

replies(2): >>44451125 #>>44451132 #
timschmidt ◴[] No.44451125[source]
I think, as much or more than Hawass's ego, the fact that tourism to Egypt and specifically Giza amounts to nearly a tenth of Egypt's GDP: https://egyptianstreets.com/2024/12/09/tourism-contribution-... accounts for a lot of his behavior.

It's big business, has been for almost 5,000 years, and keeping the mysteries alive keeps the money flowing to the cult of Kufu or the modern equivalent.

History for Granite ( https://www.youtube.com/@HistoryforGRANITE ) touches on this powerful explanation for several observable aspects of these ancient sites that otherwise defy explanation. The top of The Great Pyramid was likely flattened so that rich visitors could pay to have an unforgettable picnic at the top. Many passages were filled up with sand and rubble because guides didn't enjoy the extra time and effort in hot dark bat infested areas that tourists demanded. And so on. Zahi is carrying on a long tradition.

replies(3): >>44451574 #>>44451610 #>>44453741 #
thaumasiotes ◴[] No.44451610[source]
> It's big business, has been for almost 5,000 years

I think you're confusing "Egyptian economic activity related to tourism" with "the existence of civilization in Egypt".

replies(2): >>44452018 #>>44452428 #
1. 9dev ◴[] No.44452018[source]
Nope. There are literally voyage reports by Herodotus, who describes guides to the pyramids, street food vendors, and translators. That was about 2500 years ago, for example.
replies(1): >>44452215 #
2. thaumasiotes ◴[] No.44452215[source]
You might notice that 2500 years ago is a lot less than 5000 years ago. 5000 years ago, there were no guides to the pyramids. There was no tourism. There wasn't really writing, either.

Today tourism makes up a little more than 10% of the economy of Egypt. 2500 years ago, it would have been around 0%, for the simple reason that almost nobody could afford to be a tourist. The big businesses were grain and gold. 5000 years ago, it was actually 0%. That's when the desertification of the Sahara began and the people who had lived there came to Egypt and inserted themselves at the top of society.

replies(3): >>44452820 #>>44453488 #>>44453924 #
3. A_D_E_P_T ◴[] No.44452820[source]
> That's when the desertification of the Sahara began and the people who had lived there came to Egypt and inserted themselves at the top of society.

It's very interesting to imagine the "green Sahara" cultures, with all of their cities and temples now under tons of sand, that we otherwise have no knowledge of.

4. JetSpiegel ◴[] No.44453488[source]
Just because they were called pilgrims, they did the same thing as modeen tourists, with the corresponding economic activities: visiting landmarks, sleeping, eating, shopping.

Praying wasn't even free, if they had to sacrifice some animal.

5. ◴[] No.44453924[source]