←back to thread

What to build instead of AI agents

(decodingml.substack.com)
233 points giuliomagnifico | 1 comments | 03 Jul 25 00:02 UTC | HN request time: 0.197s | source
Show context
transcriptase ◴[03 Jul 25 00:58 UTC] No.44450515[source]▶
I love that there are somehow authorities on tech that realistically they could have 1-2 years experience with tops. It’s the reverse of the “seeking coder with 10 years of experience in a 2 year old language” meme.
replies(2): >>44450544 #>>44450763 #
noosphr ◴[03 Jul 25 01:01 UTC] No.44450544[source]▶
I've been building what's called ai agents since gpt3 came out. There are plenty of other people who did the same thing. That's five years now. If you can't be an expert after 5 years then there is no such thing as experts.

Of course agents is now a buzzword that means nothing so there is that.

replies(7): >>44450574 #>>44450635 #>>44450669 #>>44451016 #>>44451590 #>>44452288 #>>44454512 #
GPerson ◴[03 Jul 25 01:06 UTC] No.44450574[source]▶
5 years is barely a beginner in lots of fields.
replies(2): >>44450591 #>>44450720 #
hinterlands ◴[03 Jul 25 01:10 UTC] No.44450591[source]▶
More to the point, it's a field where we're constantly told that our experiences from a month ago are in no way relevant and that the latest thing is fundamentally different to what we know. Should expertise degrade just as quickly?
replies(1): >>44451954 #
1. lmm ◴[03 Jul 25 05:38 UTC] No.44451954[source]▶
Yes. The worst company I worked for was the one that allowed the guy who was a programming expert from like 30 years ago to make all important decisions.