(apnews.com)

595 points geox | 1 comments | 02 Jul 25 21:10 UTC | HN request time: 0.28s | source

Show context

timr[dead post] ◴[02 Jul 25 23:34 UTC] No.44449975[source]▶

[flagged]

roxolotl ◴[02 Jul 25 23:44 UTC] No.44450046[source]▶

Is it really that unreasonable to believe that a government run by people who’ve regularly called climate change a hoax and has a history of pulling previously public data is pulling the public data about climate change? I don’t disagree that jumping to conclusions is bad but intentionally discounting prior behavior seems just as reckless to me.

replies(3): >>44450973 #>>44454544 #>>44455099 #

1. toofy ◴[03 Jul 25 02:12 UTC] No.44450973[source]▶

>>44450046 #

no, it isn’t unreasonable at all.

i’ve noticed a large uptick over the past couple years of some people insisting it’s unreasonable to consider context and known past behaviors when we try to discuss things.

again, no, it’s not unreasonable. actually it would be incredibly silly, more unreasonable to ignore their past behaviors when discussing this.

↑

Websites hosting major US climate reports taken down