←back to thread

593 points geox | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.43s | source
Show context
aaroninsf ◴[] No.44449308[source]
The current administration is not merely racists, autocratic, and hell bent on insuring all wealth is held by the oligarch class,

it is also engaged in the most venal, short-sighted, and destructive assault on the basic functions of governance and civil society I can imagine.

I don't care what one's view is on the appropriate scale and role of federal governance, some operations are best and only accomplished at that level,

and this short of bullshit is not just a disservice to, it is an attack on the citizenry.

replies(5): >>44449362 #>>44449388 #>>44449731 #>>44450050 #>>44450174 #
janice1999 ◴[] No.44449362[source]
Destroying federal governance seems on point for people who read Yarvin and want to rule feudal micro-states as techno-kings.
replies(3): >>44449412 #>>44449569 #>>44466863 #
amarcheschi ◴[] No.44449412[source]
I guess they see themselves as high officers in those states. I fail to understand how someone could read about living in a dictatorship and go "yeah, I would like to live like that"
replies(5): >>44449589 #>>44449695 #>>44449739 #>>44449851 #>>44449945 #
anigbrowl ◴[] No.44449695[source]
Evidence suggests ~30% of people are content to be worse off in order to inflict a larger loss upon others. This paper makes for rather grim reading but imho provides a very useful heuristic for understanding the political enfironment in an era of mass communication.

Humans display a reduced set of consistent behavioral phenotypes in dyadic games

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.1600451

replies(3): >>44450368 #>>44450897 #>>44452868 #
1. SchemaLoad ◴[] No.44450897[source]
Isn't 30% roughly the percent of people who voted for this situation?
replies(1): >>44454866 #
2. ◴[] No.44454866[source]