←back to thread

133 points yowzadave | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.23s | source
Show context
andsoitis ◴[] No.44450073[source]
> Many of the most valuable scientific organizations in the world, including NOAA, NASA, the NSF, the CDC, the EPA, and the FDA,

I don’t dismiss the premise of the article and I think it is a shame how these organizations are being impacted, but I don’t know that these are the best exemplars of cutting edge science being shut down that will lead to America’s downfall from its scientific perch.

replies(10): >>44450150 #>>44450181 #>>44450242 #>>44450313 #>>44450374 #>>44450439 #>>44450468 #>>44450495 #>>44450499 #>>44454501 #
apical_dendrite ◴[] No.44450181[source]
I'm not sure why NIH is left off this list, since it's probably the most important scientific organization in the world. Between them NIH and NSF fund a huge proportion of the cutting edge science that is done in the US, either directly or by funding the training and early career work of researchers.

They fund a lot of the foundational work that doesn't get a lot of resources from the private sector. 99% of new drugs approved between 2010 and 2019 relied on NIH funding.

replies(1): >>44450281 #
analog31 ◴[] No.44450281[source]
It was probably an omission. Fill it in, and it makes sense. I believe the NIH is larger than the NSF. In addition to funding research, these agencies also fund education, both directly and indirectly.
replies(1): >>44450328 #
Loughla ◴[] No.44450328[source]
Correct. One of the guys in my cohort in post graduate work was funded by a grant from the NIH.
replies(2): >>44450380 #>>44450711 #
1. analog31 ◴[] No.44450711[source]
And in my case, the NSF.