←back to thread

What to build instead of AI agents

(decodingml.substack.com)
233 points giuliomagnifico | 4 comments | 03 Jul 25 00:02 UTC | HN request time: 0.293s | source
1. joeblubaugh ◴[03 Jul 25 01:17 UTC] No.44450631[source]▶
Why do so many examples break down to “send better spam faster”?
replies(2): >>44450768 #>>44451385 #
2. malfist ◴[03 Jul 25 01:38 UTC] No.44450768[source]▶
lol, that was literally their example wasn't it? Troll linkedin looking for people and spam them with "personalized" emails.
replies(1): >>44452278 #
3. rglover ◴[03 Jul 25 03:32 UTC] No.44451385[source]▶
What is a wheel without its grease?
4. Animats ◴[03 Jul 25 06:38 UTC] No.44452278[source]▶
That's what's so funny about this.

Spamming is not only obnoxious, but a very weak example. Spamming is so error tolerant that if 30% of the output is totally wrong, the sender won't notice. Response rates are usually very low. This is a singularly un-demanding problem.

You don't even need "AI" for this. Just score LinkedIn profiles based on keywords, and if the score is high enough, send a spam. Draft a few form letters, and send the one most appropriate for the keywords. Probably would have about the same reply rate.