←back to thread

What to build instead of AI agents

(decodingml.substack.com)
233 points giuliomagnifico | 2 comments | 03 Jul 25 00:02 UTC | HN request time: 0.424s | source
Show context
ldjkfkdsjnv ◴[03 Jul 25 00:49 UTC] No.44450452[source]▶
This is all going to be solved by better models. Building agents is building for a world that doesn't quite exist yet, but probably will in a year or two. Building some big heuristic engine that strings together LLM calls (which is what this blog advocates for) is essentially a bet against progress in ai. I'm not taking that bet, and neither are any of the major players.
replies(7): >>44450462 #>>44450475 #>>44450503 #>>44450507 #>>44450563 #>>44450783 #>>44452156 #
1. m82labs ◴[03 Jul 25 01:05 UTC] No.44450563[source]▶
So for people building real things today are you saying instead of stringing prompts together with logic we should just sit on our hands for a year and wait for the models to catch up to the agent paradigm?
replies(1): >>44450626 #
2. ldjkfkdsjnv ◴[03 Jul 25 01:16 UTC] No.44450626[source]▶
if you are in a competitive market you will lose with this approach