←back to thread

American science to soon face its largest brain drain in history

(bigthink.com)
133 points yowzadave | 1 comments | 02 Jul 25 22:42 UTC | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
bgwalter ◴[03 Jul 25 00:09 UTC] No.44450196[source]▶
[flagged]
replies(3): >>44450228 #>>44450246 #>>44450516 #
apical_dendrite ◴[03 Jul 25 00:13 UTC] No.44450228[source]▶
> How many of those were hired due to diversity programs?

This is an incredibly obnoxious and uninformed comment. NASA does not hire incompetent people because of "diversity".

> The parallel with Hitler really does not apply. The US won't be sending scientists working on nuclear weapons, stealth aircraft or profitable endeavors like GPUs.

Also an uninformed comment. The physicists that came to the US and UK and then worked on weapons programs were not for the most part working on weapons programs in Germany. They were just able to transfer those skills into the Manhattan Project, radar, or other programs.

replies(2): >>44450260 #>>44450270 #
1. the_snooze ◴[03 Jul 25 00:17 UTC] No.44450260[source]▶
It's also a very shortsighted view. R&D isn't just a bunch of eggheads grinding out a cleary-defined end like, say, nuclear weapons and making it happen. It's thousands of unseen shots on goal, most of which miss, but you get a handful of high-leverage innovations out of it.

What this pullback in US scientific funding does is reduce the number of those shots on goal. It undoes what the US prioritized from World War II onwards: that scientific innovation is foremost a strategic asset, not strictly a moneymaking venture. You saw that on display with the recent B-2 sorties over Iran: those could not have happened if not for highly specialized researchers slowly contributing to that body of work over decades.