←back to thread

Firefox 120 to Firefox 141 Web Browser Benchmarks

(www.phoronix.com)
119 points mikece | 1 comments | 02 Jul 25 15:11 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
eastbound ◴[02 Jul 25 17:19 UTC] No.44446316[source]▶
[flagged]
replies(9): >>44446361 #>>44446382 #>>44446460 #>>44446570 #>>44446847 #>>44447210 #>>44447214 #>>44457741 #>>44460623 #
Moomoomoo309 ◴[02 Jul 25 17:28 UTC] No.44446460[source]▶
Do you think those opinions would have made it more difficult to work with certain employees at Mozilla based on certain protected traits in the law? If so, I think the donation is a red herring, it's the opinion itself that's the problem.

Firing people for their opinions is actually fine - if you believe that certain types of people don't deserve rights, for example, and your company has those types of people in it, that's a problem. Freedom of opinion is not guaranteed.

replies(1): >>44446561 #
waterhouse ◴[02 Jul 25 17:36 UTC] No.44446561[source]▶
Does this approach ultimately lead to the conclusion that people on different sides of the abortion issue can't work in the same company?
replies(5): >>44446706 #>>44446871 #>>44447474 #>>44448071 #>>44448261 #
1. smt88 ◴[02 Jul 25 18:56 UTC] No.44447474[source]▶
No.

It's easy to keep abortions secret. They're protected by privacy laws, so even HR can't ask about them. Medical issues are secret from the workplace by default.

It's impossible to keep your sexuality secret if you're married. Your marital status at work is public by default. And no one should have to keep the identity of their spouse secret for fear of being treated worse by the CEO.