←back to thread

422 points simedw | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.422s | source
Show context
bubblyworld ◴[] No.44433602[source]
Classic that the first example is for parsing the goddamn recipe from the goddamn recipe site. Instant thumbs up from me haha, looks like a neat little project.
replies(3): >>44435722 #>>44436466 #>>44438277 #
lpribis ◴[] No.44438277[source]
Another great example of LLM hype train re-inventing something that already existed [1] (and was actually thought out) but making it worse and non-deterministic in the worst ways possible.

https://schema.org/Recipe

replies(6): >>44438799 #>>44439573 #>>44440529 #>>44440626 #>>44440664 #>>44440708 #
komali2 ◴[] No.44440626[source]
That's a cool schema, but the LLM solution is necessary because recipe website makers will never use the schema because they want you to have to read through garbage, with some misguided belief that this helps their SEO or something. Or maybe they get more money if you scroll through more ads?
replies(2): >>44440719 #>>44442528 #
throwaway290 ◴[] No.44442528[source]
How do they make money then? Or do you think they are doing some sort of public service and you are entitled?
replies(1): >>44445346 #
1. anExcitedBeast ◴[] No.44445346[source]
They make long articles to maximize ad exposure and SEO. It's good faith --they're doing what they have to to make money with the underlying tech ecosystem-- but it's not a good outcome.

LLMs are shifting that ecosystem (at least temporarily) and new revenue models will emerge. It'll take time to figure out. But we shouldn't artificially support a bad system just because it's the existing system.

Transitions are always awkward. In the meantime, I'm inclined to give people rope to experiment.

replies(1): >>44451552 #
2. throwaway290 ◴[] No.44451552[source]
It seems that your answer is a long euphemism for "I don't give a damn how they make money, they better find a new way I guess".