←back to thread

122 points throw0101b | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
camillomiller ◴[] No.44442592[source]
The fundamental problem I have with this analysis is that it won’t consider a simple assumption: Jack Welch was just better at the capitalism game than others. He didn’t rewrite the written rules, he just didn’t care about the ethic-based unwritten ones. With the decline of historical ideologies, hyper-individualism took over. Welch was just very good at understanding that some invisible boundaries didn’t apply anymore, and that the zeitgeist was shifting in that direction.
replies(8): >>44442732 #>>44442849 #>>44442983 #>>44442987 #>>44443168 #>>44443683 #>>44443774 #>>44445728 #
otikik ◴[] No.44442983[source]
You are using too many words to say "psychopath".
replies(1): >>44444525 #
1. _DeadFred_ ◴[] No.44444525[source]
I've said it before on here, but in the 1980s even a coked out corporate raider couldn't say the things the 2025 pro-technocapitalists routinely say without being ostracized from society for being a psychopath. People used to see other people as actual people, not disposable work units.

Think Warren Buffett style billionaire versus Elon Musk style.