←back to thread

422 points simedw | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.205s | source
Show context
mossTechnician ◴[] No.44435170[source]
Changes Spegel made to the linked recipe's ingredients:

Pounds of lamb become kilograms (more than doubling the quantity of meat), a medium onion turns large, one celery stalk becomes two, six cloves of garlic turn into four, tomato paste vanishes, we lose nearly half a cup of wine, beef stock gets an extra ¾ cup, rosemary is replaced with oregano.

replies(4): >>44435185 #>>44435234 #>>44435464 #>>44435844 #
jugglinmike ◴[] No.44435464[source]
Great catch. I was getting ready to mention the theoretical risk of asking an LLM be your arbiter of truth; it didn't even occur to me to check the chosen example for correctness. In a way, this blog post is a useful illustration not just of the hazards of LLMs, but also of our collective tendency to eschew verity for novelty.
replies(2): >>44435877 #>>44443768 #
1. throwawayoldie ◴[] No.44443768[source]
> the theoretical risk of asking an LLM be your arbiter of truth

"Theoretical"? I think you misspelled "ubiquitous".