←back to thread

406 points doppio19 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.2s | source
Show context
bentcorner ◴[] No.44438912[source]
> Mozilla couldn't find a sustainable business model for Fakespot despite its popularity

I don't know if it's fair for me to armchair quarterback, but still - what was their business model when they decided to do the acquisition? From the outside looking in barely did anything whatsoever.

I browse Amazon using Firefox extremely often and I don't recall seeing any helper UI pop up. Even so, what would have been their strategy to monetize me? User data? Commissions? Some kind of Mozilla+ subscription?

I love FF and cheer Mozilla on where I can, but honestly these decisions are inscrutable.

replies(11): >>44438998 #>>44439060 #>>44439221 #>>44439496 #>>44439787 #>>44440195 #>>44441038 #>>44441385 #>>44441772 #>>44442591 #>>44447800 #
IncreasePosts ◴[] No.44439787[source]
Mozilla wants to be the "web you can trust" brand, which involves not just shipping a browser but protecting people from the rougher sides of the internet.
replies(2): >>44440294 #>>44443259 #
1. JadeNB ◴[] No.44443259[source]
> Mozilla wants to be the "web you can trust" brand, which involves not just shipping a browser but protecting people from the rougher sides of the internet.

And also, apparently, selling your data. See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43213612, and particularly move-on's comment https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43213945.