←back to thread

406 points doppio19 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.245s | source
Show context
bentcorner ◴[] No.44438912[source]
> Mozilla couldn't find a sustainable business model for Fakespot despite its popularity

I don't know if it's fair for me to armchair quarterback, but still - what was their business model when they decided to do the acquisition? From the outside looking in barely did anything whatsoever.

I browse Amazon using Firefox extremely often and I don't recall seeing any helper UI pop up. Even so, what would have been their strategy to monetize me? User data? Commissions? Some kind of Mozilla+ subscription?

I love FF and cheer Mozilla on where I can, but honestly these decisions are inscrutable.

replies(11): >>44438998 #>>44439060 #>>44439221 #>>44439496 #>>44439787 #>>44440195 #>>44441038 #>>44441385 #>>44441772 #>>44442591 #>>44447800 #
1. account42 ◴[] No.44442591[source]
Why is Mozilla, supposedly a subsidiary of a nonprofit with the goal of making the internet better, looking for business models in the first place? They should be looking for donations, sponsors, government grants, etc.