←back to thread

406 points doppio19 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.772s | source
Show context
dankwizard ◴[] No.44439699[source]
It was falling behind. The dodgy stores were getting more creative and Fakespot needed to play catch up.

You've got stores that would include a $5-$20 coupon/gift card in the item in exchange for a positive review. Sure, this didn't 1:1 translate but if a user did it would look like a legitimate review.

You've got a plethora of LLMs out there just itching to GENERATE.

Then an expensive option I was suprised happened - I bought a Dyson clone vacuum cleaner off of Amazon. A few weeks later, the company emailed me and said 'We have a new model. Buy that one, leave a review, we'll refund the purchase'. So I did it. This happened about 10 more times in 2024. My outdoor shed is entirely stick vacuums.

Feel a bit dirty doing it but that's ok I've got 12 vacuums that can clean my conscience.

I think Fakespot would have difficulty with all 3 of these scenarios.

replies(19): >>44439710 #>>44439760 #>>44439818 #>>44440150 #>>44440187 #>>44440232 #>>44440258 #>>44440360 #>>44441005 #>>44441152 #>>44441234 #>>44441357 #>>44441565 #>>44441625 #>>44442564 #>>44442881 #>>44442918 #>>44443269 #>>44444404 #
chrischen ◴[] No.44440150[source]
When you have extremely generous return policies then reviews matter less. They are still relevant if your'e trying to optimize for buy once for life, but in that case you should just be going for established brands instead, where their reputation is their review.
replies(2): >>44440602 #>>44441157 #
solardev ◴[] No.44440602[source]
Brands don't mean much when they're constantly bought up by other companies and then used to whitewash poorer quality products.
replies(1): >>44442547 #
1. account42 ◴[] No.44442547[source]
Yes, trademarks don't make sense when the entity behind them can change completely. The whole point was to protect consumers.