←back to thread

262 points rain1 | 6 comments | | HN request time: 1.296s | source | bottom
1. OtherShrezzing ◴[] No.44442330[source]
>None of this document was not written by AI

I think in these scenarios, articles should include the prompt and generating model.

replies(4): >>44442349 #>>44442444 #>>44442461 #>>44442612 #
2. oc1 ◴[] No.44442349[source]
You are absolutely right! The AI slop is getting out of control.
3. WesolyKubeczek ◴[] No.44442444[source]
I don’t think the author knows that double negatives in English in a sentence like this cancel, not reinforce, each other.
4. kylecazar ◴[] No.44442461[source]
I thought this was an accidental double negative by the author -- trying to declare they wrote it themselves.

There are some signs it's written by possibly a non-native speaker.

5. rain1 ◴[] No.44442612[source]
I have corrected that. It was supposed to say "None of this document was written by AI."

Thank you for spotting the error.

replies(1): >>44442946 #
6. OtherShrezzing ◴[] No.44442946[source]
Understood, thanks for updating it!