←back to thread

139 points stubish | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.202s | source
Show context
jackvalentine ◴[] No.44439355[source]
Australians are broadly supportive of these kind of actions - there is a view that foreign internet behemoths have failed to moderate for themselves and will therefore have moderation imposed on them however imperfect.

Can’t say I blame them.

replies(3): >>44439415 #>>44439676 #>>44439817 #
AnthonyMouse ◴[] No.44439817[source]
> there is a view that foreign internet behemoths have failed to moderate for themselves and will therefore have moderation imposed on them however imperfect.

This view is manufactured. The premise is that better moderation is available and despite that, literally no one is choosing to do it. The fact is that moderation is hard and in particular excluding all actually bad things without also having a catastrophically high false positive rate is infeasible.

But the people who are the primary victims of the false positives and the people who want the bad stuff fully censored aren't all the same people, and then the second group likes to pretend that there is a magic solution that doesn't throw the first group under the bus, so they can throw the first group under the bus.

replies(5): >>44439891 #>>44439944 #>>44440013 #>>44440547 #>>44441786 #
1. cmoski ◴[] No.44441786[source]
I think it is less about stopping them from seeing naked pictures etc and more about stopping them getting sucked into the addictive shithole of social media.

It will also make it harder for the grubby men in their 30s and 40s to groom 14yo girls on Snapchat, which is a bonus.