←back to thread

406 points doppio19 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source
Show context
bentcorner ◴[] No.44438912[source]
> Mozilla couldn't find a sustainable business model for Fakespot despite its popularity

I don't know if it's fair for me to armchair quarterback, but still - what was their business model when they decided to do the acquisition? From the outside looking in barely did anything whatsoever.

I browse Amazon using Firefox extremely often and I don't recall seeing any helper UI pop up. Even so, what would have been their strategy to monetize me? User data? Commissions? Some kind of Mozilla+ subscription?

I love FF and cheer Mozilla on where I can, but honestly these decisions are inscrutable.

replies(11): >>44438998 #>>44439060 #>>44439221 #>>44439496 #>>44439787 #>>44440195 #>>44441038 #>>44441385 #>>44441772 #>>44442591 #>>44447800 #
1. benchly ◴[] No.44441385[source]
Rather that taking yet another opportunity to dump on Mozilla (it's easy, I know), I think a better question would be who is the alternative out there doing the work that Fakespot tried to do? Is this telling us that the task is too large for any current solutions to handle?

Just relying on consumer judgement has certainly proven to be inadequate in combating fake reviews, and without incentive, we're not going to get many legitimate reviews.