←back to thread

406 points doppio19 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.312s | source
Show context
dankwizard ◴[] No.44439699[source]
It was falling behind. The dodgy stores were getting more creative and Fakespot needed to play catch up.

You've got stores that would include a $5-$20 coupon/gift card in the item in exchange for a positive review. Sure, this didn't 1:1 translate but if a user did it would look like a legitimate review.

You've got a plethora of LLMs out there just itching to GENERATE.

Then an expensive option I was suprised happened - I bought a Dyson clone vacuum cleaner off of Amazon. A few weeks later, the company emailed me and said 'We have a new model. Buy that one, leave a review, we'll refund the purchase'. So I did it. This happened about 10 more times in 2024. My outdoor shed is entirely stick vacuums.

Feel a bit dirty doing it but that's ok I've got 12 vacuums that can clean my conscience.

I think Fakespot would have difficulty with all 3 of these scenarios.

replies(19): >>44439710 #>>44439760 #>>44439818 #>>44440150 #>>44440187 #>>44440232 #>>44440258 #>>44440360 #>>44441005 #>>44441152 #>>44441234 #>>44441357 #>>44441565 #>>44441625 #>>44442564 #>>44442881 #>>44442918 #>>44443269 #>>44444404 #
Retr0id ◴[] No.44439818[source]
I can understand going for the "free upgrade" the first time around, but why continue racking up more vacuum cleaners after that? Do you plan to sell them later?
replies(6): >>44439842 #>>44439871 #>>44440028 #>>44440272 #>>44442864 #>>44445932 #
Mtinie ◴[] No.44439871[source]
It’s the rational option if someone is giving you something for less than it costs you and the moral implications of the action is minimal (at best).
replies(3): >>44440274 #>>44440753 #>>44443118 #
probably_wrong ◴[] No.44440753[source]
All moral implications are minimal if your morals are flexible enough.

The OP is effectively taking thousands of dollars in bribes to erode public trust. I think even a child would see that this is wrong.

I know every man has their price, but I hope when the time comes my price will be higher than "a bunch of vacuums I don't need and I can't even be bothered to sell".

replies(2): >>44441078 #>>44447386 #
tempestn ◴[] No.44441078[source]
To be fair, he didn't specify that the reviews were false. Maybe he only agreed because he legitimately likes the vacuums. I think if someone offered me a product I like for free in return for a review, I'd do it. I wouldn't leave a positive review on a bad product though.
replies(1): >>44441097 #
1. dns_snek ◴[] No.44441097[source]
Come on, let's be honest here, they wouldn't keep sending you products for free if you left anything less than a stellar review. That's the entire problem with incentivized reviews.