←back to thread

Australians to face age checks from search engines

(ia.acs.org.au)
139 points stubish | 3 comments | 01 Jul 25 23:59 UTC | HN request time: 0.414s | source
Show context
azov ◴[02 Jul 25 05:01 UTC] No.44440379[source]▶
I wonder if technical complexity of implementing online age checks is about the same as implementing a robust direct democracy system - one where people can vote down bad laws instead of outsourcing those decisions wholesale to politicians they don’t even like?..
replies(1): >>44440400 #
1. ggm ◴[02 Jul 25 05:04 UTC] No.44440400[source]▶
I predict Lower.

Unrelated, but why I don't agree:

The systems which permit voting down stupid laws also permit voting down good laws. This is very "be careful what you wish for" and reductive to "the voter is always right even when they want stupid things" interpretation of democracy.

E.g. Swiss cantons opposing votes for women inside the last 2 decades.

replies(2): >>44440461 #>>44440463 #
2. _Algernon_ ◴[02 Jul 25 05:20 UTC] No.44440461[source]▶
They don't have to be always right, just be right more often than a representative democracy.
3. azov ◴[02 Jul 25 05:21 UTC] No.44440463[source]▶
Well, direct democracy already exists in various forms (e.g., referendums, propositions on California ballots, etc.). Sometimes bad decisions are made, but I wouldn’t call it a total disaster. Can it be improved through technical means? How much improvement would it take for it to be better than the status quo?