←back to thread

Ask HN: Who is hiring? (July 2025)

268 points whoishiring | 1 comments | 01 Jul 25 15:01 UTC | HN request time: 0.502s | source

Please state the location and include REMOTE for remote work, REMOTE (US) or similar if the country is restricted, and ONSITE when remote work is not an option.

Please only post if you personally are part of the hiring company—no recruiting firms or job boards. One post per company. If it isn't a household name, explain what your company does.

Please only post if you are actively filling a position and are committed to responding to applicants.

Commenters: please don't reply to job posts to complain about something. It's off topic here.

Readers: please only email if you are personally interested in the job.

Searchers: try https://dheerajck.github.io/hnwhoishiring/, https://amber-williams.github.io/hackernews-whos-hiring/, http://nchelluri.github.io/hnjobs/, https://hnresumetojobs.com, https://hnhired.fly.dev, https://kennytilton.github.io/whoishiring/, https://hnjobs.emilburzo.com, or this (unofficial) Chrome extension: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/hn-hiring-pro/mpfal....

Don't miss these other fine threads:

Who wants to be hired? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44434574

Freelancer? Seeking freelancer? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44434575

Show context
vnchr ◴[01 Jul 25 19:35 UTC] No.44437291[source]▶
GoodParty.org | Multiple Roles | REMOTE (US) | Full-time & Part-time | https://goodparty.org

We're on a mission to disrupt the corrupt two-party system by building tools that change the rules—and we need your help. GoodParty.org is not a political party; we're a fully remote, US-based team united around making democracy more accessible, transparent, and fair. If creatively disrupting politics for good sounds like a challenge you're up for, check out the roles we're looking to fill right now:

- Analytics Engineer • Engineering • Full-time

- Campaign Assistant • Politics • Full-time (Contractor)

- Content and Communications Director • Growth • Full-time

- Growth Marketer (Contractor) • Growth • Full-time (Contractor)

- Marketing Operations Manager • Growth • Full-time

- Part-time Finance & Operations Manager • Gifted Savings • Part-time

- Product Design Manager • Design • Full-time

- Product Marketing Manager • Growth • Full-time

- Senior Full Stack Engineer • Engineering • Full-time

- Senior Product Manager • Product • Full-time

- Social Media Account Manager • Growth • Full-time

- User Success Manager • Product • Full-time

Work with us: https://goodparty.org/work-with-us/

replies(4): >>44437847 #>>44438409 #>>44438846 #>>44438873 #
willguest ◴[01 Jul 25 23:22 UTC] No.44438846[source]▶
no mention of any system-level strategy on the website. this may as well be another lobbying group.

pumping more candidates (even good ones) into a busted system is like increasing the flow rate into a cracked bucket. good metrics showing how much more is going in, with little attention paid to how much is flowing out.

i do appreciate the ambition to change things at a higher level, but there is nothing resembling significant disruption here.

my suggestion would be to identify a single, core point of systemic leverage that can actually make a demonstrable change to the way things operate (i.e. patch the bucket or, better still, replace it). for example, if you can get a sensible cap put on the amount of funds that can be given in support of a political campaign (yeah, i know, good luck with that) or can instigate a nationwide movement for proportional representation, or tie up the practice of gerrymandering, that might get momentum for a bigger step.

i'm sure there is lots i don't know about the role and potential for independents in the US (i live elsewhere), but the principle still holes that a problem must be solved by a higher level of complexity than the one that created it.

so i implore you, don't stop what you are doing, but try to find the next step up into systems thinking or, even better, meta-systematic strategy, which is actually what is needed for serious political reform.

there are, of course, many ways to shoot down my argument, and it is true to some extent that 'policy is personnel', but the level of systemic failure evidenced in recent years makes me think that such an initiative, while valuable in itself, cannot flourish in the way it needs to in order to be effective

replies(2): >>44439767 #>>44440185 #
1. vnchr ◴[02 Jul 25 04:13 UTC] No.44440185[source]▶
That’s interesting feedback about there not being a system level strategy communicated on the site. I’ll pass that along. Thanks for pointing that out.

It’s very much a system level strategy, but more by way of democratized technology as opposed to head on disruption. I asked the same questions when I joined.

We want to provide powerful technology to candidates that are not going to be supported by the two main parties. And we have some other qualifications, like not taking corporate money. The more that independent candidates can succeed and win, the more we normalize the electorate expecting something that isn’t just to two main parties. In a way, it’s the electorate that we are trying to empower by supporting viable alternatives to the current system.

I’m glad there is interest in what we’re doing. I think we are on track too, making increasing impacts and I am excited about our growing team.