←back to thread

406 points doppio19 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source
Show context
bentcorner ◴[] No.44438912[source]
> Mozilla couldn't find a sustainable business model for Fakespot despite its popularity

I don't know if it's fair for me to armchair quarterback, but still - what was their business model when they decided to do the acquisition? From the outside looking in barely did anything whatsoever.

I browse Amazon using Firefox extremely often and I don't recall seeing any helper UI pop up. Even so, what would have been their strategy to monetize me? User data? Commissions? Some kind of Mozilla+ subscription?

I love FF and cheer Mozilla on where I can, but honestly these decisions are inscrutable.

replies(11): >>44438998 #>>44439060 #>>44439221 #>>44439496 #>>44439787 #>>44440195 #>>44441038 #>>44441385 #>>44441772 #>>44442591 #>>44447800 #
burnt-resistor ◴[] No.44439060[source]
Mozilla seems infected by corporate board members who probably have conflicts of interest including investments in Amazon, Google, etc.
replies(1): >>44439614 #
TylerE ◴[] No.44439614[source]
Mozilla seems to be infected by upper management that feels a need to justify ever spiraling salaries.
replies(3): >>44439867 #>>44440134 #>>44441119 #
1. ethbr1 ◴[] No.44439867[source]
It's easier to justify a new thing than it is to make an improvement in an existing thing.

Why do you think VPs love new projects / products so much?