←back to thread

Building a Personal AI Factory

(www.john-rush.com)
260 points derek | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.278s | source
Show context
steveklabnik ◴[] No.44438330[source]
I'd love to see more specifics here, that is, how Claude and o3 talk to each other, an example session, etc.
replies(3): >>44438361 #>>44438366 #>>44438730 #
schmookeeg ◴[] No.44438730[source]
I use Zen MCP and OpenRouter. Every once in awhile, my instance of claude code will "phone a friend" and use Gemini for a code review. Often unprompted, sometimes me asking for "analysis" or "ultrathink" about a thorny feature when I doubt the proposed implementation will work out or cause footguns.

It's wild to see in action when it's unprompted.

For planning, I usually do a trip out to Gemini to check our work, offer ideas, research, and ratings of completeness. The iterations seem to be helpful, at least to me.

Everyone in these sorta threads asks for "proofs" and I don't really know what to offer. It's like 4 cents for a second opinion on what claude's planning has cooked up, and the detailed response has been interesting.

I loaded 10 bucks onto OpenRouter last month and I think I've pulled it down by like 50 cents. Meanwhile I'm on Claude Max @ $200/mo and GPT Plus for another $20. The OpenRouter stuff seems like less than couch change.

$0.02 :D

replies(3): >>44438830 #>>44438942 #>>44439781 #
1. Uehreka ◴[] No.44439781[source]
> Everyone in these sorta threads asks for "proofs" and I don't really know what to offer

I’ve tried building these kinds of multi agent systems a couple times, and I’ve found that there’s a razor thin edge between a nice “humming along” system I feel good about and a “car won’t start” system where the first LLM refuses to properly output JSON and then the rest of them start reading each others <think> thoughts.

The difference seems to often come down to:

- Which LLM wrappers are you using? Are they using/exposing features like MCP, tools and chain-of-thought correctly for the particular models you’re using?

- What are your prompts? What are the 5 bullet points with capital letters that need to be in there to keep things in line? Is there a trick to getting certain LLMs to actually use the available MCP tools?

- Which particular LLM versions are you using? I’ve heard people say that Claude Sonnet 4 is actually better than Claude Opus 4 sometimes, so it’s not always an intuitive “pick the best model” kind of thing.

- Is your system capable of “humming along” for hours or is this a thing where you’re doing a ton of copy-paste between interfaces? If it’s the latter then hey, whatever works for you works for you. But a lot of people see the former as a difficult-to-attain Holy Grail, so if you’ve figured out the exact mixture of prompts/tools that makes that happen people are gonna want to know the details.

The overall wisdom in the post about inputs mattering more than outputs etc is totally spot on, and anyone who hasn’t figured that out yet should master that before getting into these weeds. But for those of us who are on that level, we’d love to know more about exactly what you’re getting out of this and how you’re doing it.

(And thanks for the details you’ve provided so far! I’ll have to check out Zen MCP)