←back to thread

Building a Personal AI Factory

(www.john-rush.com)
260 points derek | 3 comments | 01 Jul 25 21:14 UTC | HN request time: 1.565s | source
Show context
photon_garden ◴[01 Jul 25 22:08 UTC] No.44438401[source]▶
It’s hard to evaluate setups like this without knowing how the resulting code is being used.

Standalone vibe coded apps for personal use? Pretty easy to believe.

Writing high quality code in a complex production system? Much harder to believe.

replies(2): >>44438831 #>>44439142 #
1. 9cb14c1ec0 ◴[02 Jul 25 00:15 UTC] No.44439142[source]▶
Exactly. I use claude code as a major speedup in coding, but I stay in the loop on every code change to make sure it is creating an optimal system. The few times that I've just let it run have resulted in bugs that customers had to deal with.
replies(2): >>44440091 #>>44440755 #
2. Aeolun ◴[02 Jul 25 03:45 UTC] No.44440091[source]▶
I think you can probably get a pretty decent thing going if you have models review output they haven’t written themselves (not still in context anyway)
3. stpedgwdgfhgdd ◴[02 Jul 25 06:26 UTC] No.44440755[source]▶
I noticed that i hardly look anymore at the generated Go code… I do give a lot of attention to the tests. I let CC write some failing tests, implement. Let it run against some real scenarios. Find bugs, let it write more tests, fix. And iterate.

Writing this I realise, i should more clearly separate the functional tests from the implementation oriented unit tests.