←back to thread

Ask HN: Who is hiring? (July 2025)

268 points whoishiring | 4 comments | 01 Jul 25 15:01 UTC | HN request time: 0.934s | source

Please state the location and include REMOTE for remote work, REMOTE (US) or similar if the country is restricted, and ONSITE when remote work is not an option.

Please only post if you personally are part of the hiring company—no recruiting firms or job boards. One post per company. If it isn't a household name, explain what your company does.

Please only post if you are actively filling a position and are committed to responding to applicants.

Commenters: please don't reply to job posts to complain about something. It's off topic here.

Readers: please only email if you are personally interested in the job.

Searchers: try https://dheerajck.github.io/hnwhoishiring/, https://amber-williams.github.io/hackernews-whos-hiring/, http://nchelluri.github.io/hnjobs/, https://hnresumetojobs.com, https://hnhired.fly.dev, https://kennytilton.github.io/whoishiring/, https://hnjobs.emilburzo.com, or this (unofficial) Chrome extension: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/hn-hiring-pro/mpfal....

Don't miss these other fine threads:

Who wants to be hired? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44434574

Freelancer? Seeking freelancer? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44434575

Show context
vnchr ◴[01 Jul 25 19:35 UTC] No.44437291[source]▶
GoodParty.org | Multiple Roles | REMOTE (US) | Full-time & Part-time | https://goodparty.org

We're on a mission to disrupt the corrupt two-party system by building tools that change the rules—and we need your help. GoodParty.org is not a political party; we're a fully remote, US-based team united around making democracy more accessible, transparent, and fair. If creatively disrupting politics for good sounds like a challenge you're up for, check out the roles we're looking to fill right now:

- Analytics Engineer • Engineering • Full-time

- Campaign Assistant • Politics • Full-time (Contractor)

- Content and Communications Director • Growth • Full-time

- Growth Marketer (Contractor) • Growth • Full-time (Contractor)

- Marketing Operations Manager • Growth • Full-time

- Part-time Finance & Operations Manager • Gifted Savings • Part-time

- Product Design Manager • Design • Full-time

- Product Marketing Manager • Growth • Full-time

- Senior Full Stack Engineer • Engineering • Full-time

- Senior Product Manager • Product • Full-time

- Social Media Account Manager • Growth • Full-time

- User Success Manager • Product • Full-time

Work with us: https://goodparty.org/work-with-us/

replies(4): >>44437847 #>>44438409 #>>44438846 #>>44438873 #
Taikonerd ◴[01 Jul 25 22:09 UTC] No.44438409[source]▶
When I read "disrupt the corrupt two-party system," I wondered if you were pushing for voting reforms such as ranked-choice voting that make it easier for third-party candidates to win.

It seems like that's not the main focus of your org, but I was pleased to see a reference to RCV in your blog: [0]

[0]: https://goodparty.org/blog/article/final-five-voting-explain...

replies(1): >>44438629 #
1. bravesoul2 ◴[01 Jul 25 22:45 UTC] No.44438629[source]▶
I live in Australia and we have preferential voting. We also don't vote for a president but the prime minister is decided by majority of seats in house of representatives.

It still ends up mostly being a 2 party thing. Supporting your team is deep rooted. However at least there is the potential for a third party to get in.

But it suffers from the same statistical issue. If a quarter of voters vote green but equally across seats then that popular vote is not represented in the number of seats.

It is a vote of a vote still.

I wonder if we can move away from representation purely on where you live.

Where you live means something. City vs. Countryside. Poor neighbourhoods vs. Rich. But if your issue is suffered by many but you don't all cluster together in latitude and longitude then that issue has less weight.

Sorry forgot this is who's hiring!

replies(1): >>44439566 #
2. theteapot ◴[02 Jul 25 01:46 UTC] No.44439566[source]▶
Current US house of reps (435 seats):

  Republicans: 220 seats.
  Democrats: 215 seats.
  Independents/Third Party: 0 seats.
Current AU house of reps (150 seats):

  Australian Labor Party (ALP): 94 seats
  Coalition: 43 seats (combined Liberal/National parties)
  Australian Greens: 1 seat
  Centre Alliance: 1 seat
  Katter's Australian Party: 1 seat
  Independents: 10 seats
replies(1): >>44439657 #
3. bravesoul2 ◴[02 Jul 25 02:07 UTC] No.44439657[source]▶
It's definitely better. But it's not proportional representation.

E.g. Greens got about 12.2% of vote.

12.2% of 150 is 18, not 1.

https://www.theguardian.com/news/ng-interactive/2025/jun/02/...

The system while better is biased towards parties who can get the majority of individual constituencies based on geographic location. It relies on localized monocultures to get democracy for smaller parties. But that doesn't happen.

replies(1): >>44440345 #
4. theteapot ◴[02 Jul 25 04:51 UTC] No.44440345{3}[source]▶
House of representatives is not designed to provide proportional representation based on aggregate % vote country wide. Senate is more aligned that way and it's reflected in the numbers, in AU:

Current US senate (100 seats):

  Republicans: 53 seats (Majority Party)
  Democrats: 45 seats (Minority Party)
  Independents: 2 seats
Current AU senate (76):

  Australian Labor Party: 29
  Coalition: 27
  Australian Greens: 10
  Pauline Hanson's One Nation: 4
  Jacqui Lambie Network: 1
  Australia's Voice: 1
  United Australia Party: 1
  Independents: 3
So Greens are slightly over represented in the AU Senate based on aggregate vote if 12.2% is correct.