←back to thread

422 points simedw | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
mromanuk ◴[] No.44434455[source]
I definitely like the LLM in the middle, it’s a nice way to circumvent the SEO machine and how Google has optimized writing in recent years. Removing all the cruft from a recipe is a brilliant case for an LLM. And I suspect more of this is coming: LLMs to filter. I mean, it would be nice to just read the recipe from HTML, but SEO has turned everything into an arms race.
replies(4): >>44434855 #>>44434902 #>>44436950 #>>44437457 #
tines ◴[] No.44437457[source]
> Removing all the cruft from a recipe is a brilliant case for an LLM

Is it though, when the LLM might mutate the recipe unpredictably? I can't believe people trust probabilistic software for cases that cannot tolerate error.

replies(2): >>44437801 #>>44438254 #
kccqzy ◴[] No.44437801[source]
I agree with you in general, but recipes are not a case where precision matters. I sometimes ask LLMs to give me a recipe and if it hallucinates something it will simply be taste bad. Not much different from a human-written recipe where the human has drastically different tastes than I do. Also you basically never apply the recipe blindly; you have intuition from years of cooking to know you need to adjust recipes to taste.
replies(3): >>44438002 #>>44438212 #>>44438257 #
1. tines ◴[] No.44438002[source]
Huh? You don't care if an LLM switches pounds to kilograms because... recipes might taste bad anyway????
replies(1): >>44438328 #
2. kccqzy ◴[] No.44438328[source]
Switching pounds with kilograms is off by a factor of two. Most people capable of cooking should have the intuition to know something is awfully wrong if you are off by a factor of two, especially since pounds and kilograms are fairly large units when it comes to cooking.