←back to thread

238 points jamesbvaughan | 3 comments | | HN request time: 1.347s | source
1. taeric ◴[] No.44437995[source]
Reminds me of the excitement I got on seeing https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tyTgyzUJqM. I still get excited about trying something like this again pretty much every time I see it. Have yet to really get any traction on anything. :(

A lot of folks had fun watching Minecraft built using a live code session, if I recall.

replies(1): >>44444439 #
2. legobmw99 ◴[] No.44444439[source]
Hot reload in Java is still a crucial part of my workflow for modding Minecraft, but it doesn't have the other direction where an action in the game could alter the code
replies(1): >>44444797 #
3. taeric ◴[] No.44444797[source]
Ah, fair. Seems that is probably more applicable to image based development than it is typical batch processed source files? Doesn't seem too strange to have your code editing a data file, for example. No reason you couldn't treat your source as a data object, in some sense. Though, I'll note Common Lisp explicitly warns against editing literal objects. Such that I'm assuming this was considered and largely agreed to be a bad idea. :D