←back to thread

312 points trauco | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.255s | source
Show context
JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.44414925[source]
“Researchers say the satellites themselves are operating normally and do not appear to have suffered any errors that would physically prevent the data from continuing to be collected and distributed, so the abrupt data halt might have been an intentional decision.”

Wait, the U.S. aren’t even going to try selling the satellites? We’re just scrapping them?

replies(6): >>44415099 #>>44415117 #>>44415214 #>>44416270 #>>44416880 #>>44417912 #
toomuchtodo ◴[] No.44415117[source]
The intent is to disable the capability to ignore the data. If you allow access to someone else, you're not preventing the data capture and dissemination. If the data shows hurricanes are intensifying in strength due to climate change, and you no longer capture the data, you can say with a straight face "No it isn't and you can't prove it."

How large systems with exposure to these places (insurance, capital markets) respond is what you should look to next. What do you do when you don't have the data to accurately price risk?

Relevant comments:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43366311

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42450680

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41664750 (top comment of this thread aggressively relevant)

replies(6): >>44415236 #>>44415334 #>>44415686 #>>44418741 #>>44422758 #>>44432823 #
1. xnx ◴[] No.44432823[source]
There are a lot of things that Republicans hate, but truth and facts must top the list.