←back to thread

126 points PaulHoule | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ggm ◴[] No.44429069[source]
Some amount of price control makes sense for strategic defensive reasons: Japan isn't self sufficient in food but like many other economies wants to ensure a viable farming sector.

I'm not sure this amount of price control is needed for that outcome. From TV I get the impression Japanese rice production is pretty intensive, but also small plot focussed so not as efficient as Australia where it's miles and miles of field to the horizon.

Maybe Japanese rice farmers are a protected species?

replies(3): >>44429223 #>>44429430 #>>44429471 #
pfdietz ◴[] No.44429430[source]
A better strategic defense would be domestic meat production, with feed that can be diverted to direct human consumption in an emergency. This would build in a large buffer due to the inefficiency of conversion of feed calories to meat calories.
replies(2): >>44429598 #>>44430476 #
1. gottorf ◴[] No.44429598[source]
Defensive domestic meat production can't work without other defensive measures. Otherwise, meat producers will just import cost-effective feed from other places, which will shrivel up once geopolitical instability hits.
replies(1): >>44430383 #
2. LAC-Tech ◴[] No.44430383[source]
Surely you can graze animals in japan?
replies(1): >>44430577 #
3. dmurray ◴[] No.44430577[source]
Normally grazing means grass, which doesn't fit the strategic goal of "feed that can be diverted to direct human consumption in an emergency."

But yes, surely with some combination of taxes, subsidies and there being no better economic use for the land, you can get people to grow soy or barley and feed cattle with it.