←back to thread

113 points doener | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
fjfaase ◴[] No.44419355[source]
I fear that the general public in Germany will not be praising this achievement. The once efficient and punctional trains in Germany have deteriorated severely in the past years due to lots of delayed maintenance causing lots of delays and even regular cancelations of trains. Also the road infrastructure is suffering from delayed maintenance.
replies(8): >>44419471 #>>44419521 #>>44419748 #>>44419829 #>>44419918 #>>44420115 #>>44420167 #>>44420389 #
attendant3446 ◴[] No.44419471[source]
That's exactly it, it's not the new top speed they need, they lack efficiency. And it's not just Deutschebahn. For example BVG, who runs busses and U-bahn in Berlin is even less reliable.
replies(1): >>44419707 #
simianwords ◴[] No.44419707[source]
I think higher speeds can help efficiency. For example it can help catch up a train that has been delayed.
replies(4): >>44419791 #>>44419928 #>>44420614 #>>44420999 #
danieldk ◴[] No.44419928[source]
West European rail is very full, so rail use is carefully coordinated, since trains of vastly different speeds (e.g. ICE vs a regional train) use the same tracks.

If an ICE is, say, 15 minutes late, they cannot just drive faster to catch up. The schedule went on, and at that point there may be a much slower regional or intercity train on the same trajectory.

This is why ICE delays tend to cascade. It starts with a short delay, the ICE gets stuck behind a slower train, increasing the delay, etc.

The solution is better maintenance of tracks and trains, adding more rail capacity, adding redundancy, etc.

Of course, these are all much more expensive than an ICE speed experiment for PR.

replies(2): >>44420329 #>>44420352 #
simianwords ◴[] No.44420352[source]
This looks technically correct but let’s exaggerate the speed up to drive my point. Let’s assume trains are 2x faster now than before. You can now either reduce the time and pack the schedule or use the extra “x” time for catching up when needed. Where does this logic break?
replies(1): >>44420763 #
scott_w ◴[] No.44420763[source]
> the ICE gets stuck behind a slower train, increasing the delay, etc.

Right here. Those slower (older) trains don't magically get any faster just because the train behind it sped up.

> pack the schedule

You actually can't just double it up because faster trains need bigger gaps between them, just like driving on a motorway. If the train in front needs to slow/stop for whatever reason, you don't want the train behind smashing into it at 400km/h because it was tailgating.

replies(1): >>44424427 #
1. simianwords ◴[] No.44424427{3}[source]
Yeah I agree - you need big percentage of trains to get faster for the full effect.