←back to thread

137 points transpute | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.336s | source
Show context
transpute ◴[] No.44417727[source]
More coverage of RF sensing, including laptops/phones with radios+NPU to sense their human:

2025, "Espargos: ESP32-based WiFi sensing array", 30 comments, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43079023

2024, "How Wi-Fi sensing became usable to track people's movements", https://www.technologyreview.com/2024/02/27/1088154/wifi-sen...

2023, "What Is mmWave Radar?: Everything You Need to Know About FMCW", 30 comments, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35312351

2022, "mmWave radar, you won't see it coming", 180 comments, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30172647

2021, "The next big Wi-Fi standard is for sensing, not communication", 200 comments, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29901587

replies(3): >>44419092 #>>44419294 #>>44421801 #
Animats ◴[] No.44419092[source]
Right. The longer range versions of multistatic radar are used to detect stealth aircraft.[1][2] All that careful stealth geometry to minimize direct reflections doesn't help much when the emitters and receivers are in different locations.

[1] https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2024/11/18/737423/guardians-of...

[2] https://www.yiminzhang.com/pdf/radar13_passive.pdf

replies(3): >>44420317 #>>44421093 #>>44424653 #
Grayskull ◴[] No.44421093[source]
Well, you don't even need a radar. Tamara sensor could detect B-2, when it had it's onboard radar on.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamara_passive_sensor

replies(4): >>44422369 #>>44422853 #>>44423050 #>>44424415 #
1. wat10000 ◴[] No.44424415[source]
I'm pretty sure that "don't operate your radar in enemy airspace" is right below "don't email your flight plan to the enemy" on the list of tips for stealth pilots who want to survive a mission.