←back to thread

181 points zdw | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
whatever1 ◴[] No.44420959[source]
Is it the right time to rant about the cert expiration as a concept? I understand why certs might be revoked. But expire?
replies(7): >>44421005 #>>44421014 #>>44421298 #>>44421364 #>>44421391 #>>44421714 #>>44421852 #
em-bee ◴[] No.44421298[source]
revoking certs does not work. it is so bad that the end result is that by 2029 certificates will not be allowed to be valid longer than 47 days: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43693900
replies(1): >>44421718 #
layer8 ◴[] No.44421718[source]
TLS server certificates, that is. It’s perfectly fine for other uses of certificates.
replies(1): >>44423068 #
1. em-bee ◴[] No.44423068[source]
true, but i would guess that revoking certificates doesn't work in general, so this would apply to any situation where revoking is necessary.
replies(1): >>44425479 #
2. layer8 ◴[] No.44425479[source]
That guess is incorrect. Revocations are routine in PKI-based electronic signatures and authentication, and do work there.