←back to thread

137 points transpute | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
transpute ◴[] No.44417727[source]
More coverage of RF sensing, including laptops/phones with radios+NPU to sense their human:

2025, "Espargos: ESP32-based WiFi sensing array", 30 comments, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43079023

2024, "How Wi-Fi sensing became usable to track people's movements", https://www.technologyreview.com/2024/02/27/1088154/wifi-sen...

2023, "What Is mmWave Radar?: Everything You Need to Know About FMCW", 30 comments, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35312351

2022, "mmWave radar, you won't see it coming", 180 comments, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30172647

2021, "The next big Wi-Fi standard is for sensing, not communication", 200 comments, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29901587

replies(3): >>44419092 #>>44419294 #>>44421801 #
Animats ◴[] No.44419092[source]
Right. The longer range versions of multistatic radar are used to detect stealth aircraft.[1][2] All that careful stealth geometry to minimize direct reflections doesn't help much when the emitters and receivers are in different locations.

[1] https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2024/11/18/737423/guardians-of...

[2] https://www.yiminzhang.com/pdf/radar13_passive.pdf

replies(3): >>44420317 #>>44421093 #>>44424653 #
Grayskull ◴[] No.44421093[source]
Well, you don't even need a radar. Tamara sensor could detect B-2, when it had it's onboard radar on.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamara_passive_sensor

replies(4): >>44422369 #>>44422853 #>>44423050 #>>44424415 #
1. ta20240528 ◴[] No.44422853[source]
It turns out for the Iran drama, that radar's like the Tamara have to survive the F-35s first, then the F-15s…

Which they don't.

Then the B-2s fly in in unopposed.

The key to the B-2s is dropping the F-35s. Which seems to be hard.