←back to thread

312 points trauco | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.2s | source
Show context
Animats ◴[] No.44415142[source]
It's part of the Administration's war on ... Florida?
replies(6): >>44415258 #>>44415321 #>>44415633 #>>44416292 #>>44416775 #>>44418996 #
oksowhat ◴[] No.44415633[source]
I was about to say this -- the impact is to deep red states -- Florida, Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama.

They all voted for this with extreme skew towards the current policies. What is the point of trying to save this satellite data if the very people most affected dont care for it?

replies(3): >>44417486 #>>44418600 #>>44422811 #
63 ◴[] No.44417486[source]
I strongly suspect that said states will still find a way to get federal funds for relief, whether from the president directly (since Trump's stated plan is to replace FEMA with his own discretion) or, in an emergency, through a very quick act from congress. Of course, it's much cheaper to mitigate hurricane damage _before_ it's done so gutting all the planning related services as the Trump administration seems wont to do will only either hurt a lot of people in red states or, more likely, cost the country more than if they'd left NOAA and FEMA alone.
replies(2): >>44418228 #>>44422819 #
1. tekknik ◴[] No.44422819[source]
I mean CA does nothing to mitigate fire risk and still gets funding and cries when they don’t. So why would any other state be different?