←back to thread

209 points alexcos | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.205s | source
Show context
liendolucas ◴[] No.44421182[source]
I didn't understand a single word about this post and what was supposed to be solved and had to stop reading.

Was this actually written by a human being? If so, the author(s) suffer from severe language communication problems. Doesn't seem to be grounded at least with reality and my personal experience with robotics. But here's my real world take:

Robotics is going to be partially solved when ROS/ROS2 becomes effectively exterminated and completely replaced by a sane robotics framework.

I seriously urge the authors to use ROS/ROS2. Show us, implementing your solution with ROS, pushing it to a repository and allow others to verify what you solved, maybe?. Suffer a bit with the framework and then write a real post about real robotics hands-on, and not just wander on fancy uncomprehensible stuff that probably no-one will ever do.

Then we can maybe start talking about robotics.

replies(4): >>44422507 #>>44423136 #>>44425734 #>>44427473 #
1. rage4774 ◴[] No.44422507[source]
I totally agree with you. On the other hand the theory behind it -to combine image recognition to predict the outcome based on specific physical impacts- does sound intriguing and like a somewhat newer idea.

But besides that, you‘re totally right. It’s too „loose“ since to realize that idea the process would have to be way different (and properly explained)