←back to thread

The $25k car is going extinct?

(media.hubspot.com)
319 points pseudolus | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.629s | source
1. jvanderbot ◴[] No.44422372[source]
Is anyone following Slate auto? They claim to be making a suburban pickup in the Ford Ranger size for ~20k. I've been cautiously optimistic about my reservation.

They apparently optimized for cost and molecularity, most notably by removing the infotainment system, which apparently is the biggest warranty / "feature" cost center.

replies(2): >>44422402 #>>44423185 #
2. bagels ◴[] No.44422402[source]
27.5k, they're doing the dishonest thing of including tax incentives that not everyone qualifies for, and probably won't exist soon.
replies(1): >>44422667 #
3. jvanderbot ◴[] No.44422667[source]
Fair. But, 27.5 is very much in line with discussion around affordable cars (esp vs entry level trucks nowadays).
4. chis ◴[] No.44423185[source]
It's a pretty car but I feel like they are mostly just selling a story about cost savings. Third party carplay screens can be bought for $150 so that just can't be very meaningful. The real cost savings is that it's a cheaply built EV with a small battery. Plus it's hard to get excited talking about the price a startup is claiming to sell cars at, before any have made it to consumers.

That being said the car looks sweet. I hope we have more startups making retro-vibe electric cars since the barrier to entry is much lower than with combustion engines.

replies(1): >>44427854 #
5. jvanderbot ◴[] No.44427854[source]
Apparently (and I'm paraphrasing), the cost of the screen is not much. There's the cost of controls integration, at least, but also feature segmentation and warranty servicing. Apparently that's a lot of work to provide / cover and infotainment is one of the top warranty items. So it makes it a lot cheaper to just add a rack for your off the shelf bluetooth speaker.