←back to thread

252 points nivethan | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.535s | source
Show context
bigyabai ◴[] No.44393404[source]
> We were fascinated with the Apple store in the mall because it was essentially an interactive luxury goods store where they'd let you actually grasp all the luxury goods with your teenager hands.

The secret being, of course, that they're not actually luxury goods. Like many things at the mall, it's a high-margin doodad sold to people in the proverbial impulse aisle of life. Dippin' Dots, knock-off watches, Build-A-Bear workshop - all in same vein of "looks expensive but is cheap to make" no different from the iPod.

I think the American shopping mall is one of the things that helped me contextualize Apple's brand identity. Apple does good marking in isolation or on a screen, SF Pro looks very stunning and the Apple logo is chic and simple. But so is the Cartier logo. And the Rolex storefront. Or any of the other genuinely valuable things sold at malls. It's the marketing that people respond to, not the value of a good.

replies(6): >>44419066 #>>44419098 #>>44419210 #>>44419219 #>>44419440 #>>44423092 #
ericmay ◴[] No.44419066[source]
I largely agree with you, but I think one of Apple’s secret sauces (and they aren’t the only one) is that while their products are to some marketed as luxury items, they are in fact coupled with extremely high utility which is a somewhat new concept, in my view.

The iPhone or your equivalent Android device truly is one of the most useful inventions humanity has ever created, especially for the era that we currently exist in.

replies(3): >>44419097 #>>44419113 #>>44419177 #
1. rekenaut ◴[] No.44419113[source]
Outside of urban centers, the only other device that is similarly valuable is a car, but the average American new car purchase costs 65 times the average American new phone purchase. While there is obviously a lot of nuance here, this makes phones feel downright cheap (or conversely, cars downright expensive) compared to imparted value.
replies(1): >>44420031 #
2. eigen ◴[] No.44420031[source]
> the average American new car purchase costs 65 times the average American new phone purchase

and you keep a phone 1-8 years but a car 3-20 years or 4x as long? seems like a bad ratio