←back to thread

312 points trauco | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.414s | source
Show context
JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.44414925[source]
“Researchers say the satellites themselves are operating normally and do not appear to have suffered any errors that would physically prevent the data from continuing to be collected and distributed, so the abrupt data halt might have been an intentional decision.”

Wait, the U.S. aren’t even going to try selling the satellites? We’re just scrapping them?

replies(6): >>44415099 #>>44415117 #>>44415214 #>>44416270 #>>44416880 #>>44417912 #
toomuchtodo ◴[] No.44415117[source]
The intent is to disable the capability to ignore the data. If you allow access to someone else, you're not preventing the data capture and dissemination. If the data shows hurricanes are intensifying in strength due to climate change, and you no longer capture the data, you can say with a straight face "No it isn't and you can't prove it."

How large systems with exposure to these places (insurance, capital markets) respond is what you should look to next. What do you do when you don't have the data to accurately price risk?

Relevant comments:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43366311

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42450680

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41664750 (top comment of this thread aggressively relevant)

replies(6): >>44415236 #>>44415334 #>>44415686 #>>44418741 #>>44422758 #>>44432823 #
mnky9800n ◴[] No.44415236[source]
I think it’s even more nefarious than that. They can attack other countries that claim intensifying climate and weather scenarios by saying their data is biased while claiming to have the best data in the world but not share for national security reasons. While this may seem like something unbelievable to you or me it is easily eaten up by their supporters who love propaganda. Like, my republican parents are convinced robotaxi is amaxing after the unreasonably bad debut in Austin. They simply didn’t hear or want to hear that Tesla would not produce a working product.
replies(3): >>44415572 #>>44416375 #>>44418362 #
827a ◴[] No.44418362[source]
What I find interesting is how clear your media biases shine through even while attempting to make a statement about how this is something that's happening to the other side.

I haven't seen evidence that the Austin robotaxi launch was unreasonably bad. There were a couple viral incidents of undesirable behavior, though no collisions as far as I've heard, which is significantly better performance than one expects from typical human drivers.

replies(1): >>44418772 #
1. trehalose ◴[] No.44418772[source]
You expect a group of less than twenty human drivers to have at least one collision per week?
replies(1): >>44419226 #
2. 827a ◴[] No.44419226[source]
Between 0 and 1 collisions per week, the actual number significantly more than FSD as a whole system experiences.