←back to thread

144 points scubakid | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.757s | source
1. dottjt ◴[] No.44418406[source]
I find it interesting how China is so keen to develop EVs as a way to get away from oil dependency, yet other areas of their economy aren't treated with the same urgency.
replies(2): >>44418617 #>>44418651 #
2. cavisne ◴[] No.44418617[source]
Doesn't seem that confusing, they import most of their hydrocarbons so its a domestic security risk if/when they invade Taiwan. The US navy can blockade oil tankers but they arent going to be chasing fishing vessels around the ocean trying to stop fishing.
replies(1): >>44418926 #
3. fuzztester ◴[] No.44418651[source]
it's for the dough, bro.

should be obv.

also, ever heard of the asian concept of "face"?

it exists at country level too, not just individual level.

4. dottjt ◴[] No.44418926[source]
What I'm describing is much broader: Food security i.e. running out of fish to extract from the seas.
replies(1): >>44419343 #
5. maxglute ◴[] No.44419343{3}[source]
60/75m (~80%) metric tons of PRC seafood is from domestic aquaculture. That's one of the highest % of aquaculture share out of total fisheries of any country. 60% of global aquashare total. It's not urgent because it's already addressed, like EV, food security was literally Xi's first priority when he entered office with reduce food waste program.

People bitching about PRC fishing is like people bitching about PRC coal, i.e. most of coal use has stablized, with renewable making up new energy production. PRC DWF has also mostly stablized with seafood increase via aquaculture.

Except with coal as % of energy mix is way higher than PRC DWF as % of fisheries. AKA it's a made up problem, it so much as PRC is unique bad behaviour.