←back to thread

262 points Anon84 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.441s | source
Show context
PaulHoule ◴[] No.44408335[source]
Why does no-one dare say "schizotypy?"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schizotypy

replies(2): >>44408414 #>>44408856 #
crawfordcomeaux ◴[] No.44408414[source]
It's dangerous to existing systems for people to become aware they're capable of creating/conjuring/channeling useful new voices in the mind to help learn different things. People get burned at the stake for that.
replies(2): >>44408435 #>>44408686 #
bad_haircut72 ◴[] No.44408435[source]
I've never ever had any symptoms of schizophrenia but the idea of trying to consciously encourage myself hearing voices is terrifying, Im sure I could send myself truly insane with probably not much effort.
replies(3): >>44408683 #>>44408708 #>>44410660 #
PaulHoule ◴[] No.44408683[source]
My belief about is that the core of schizotypy and schizophrenia is

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thought_disorder

as did Eugen Bleuler. I have a friend who is schizophrenic whose speech hardly makes sense and she is always calling people on the phone and carrying on nonsensical conversations. Somehow the general public is hung up on ‘hearing voices’ but I have never once heard a voice but under stress I (schizotypal) did once spend about six months under the influence of a ‘system of delusions’ yet stayed mostly functional, kept working, and managed to avoid getting in serious trouble.

I think it is quite ordinary also for people to have a dialogue with an ‘invisible friend’ or believe that they ‘talk to God’ when they pray, the auditory hallucinations of schizophrenia seem to be something like you have a thought that you don’t think is your thought but somebody else talking, notably schizophrenics often believe that somebody is putting thoughts into them or taking thoughts out of them, see

https://www.theairloom.org/mindcontrol.php

replies(2): >>44408836 #>>44408878 #
DiscourseFan ◴[] No.44408836[source]
It's like gang-stalking--its not that there's something being introduced, but rather that the subject sees relations that are not objective relations (like, for instance, the relation between temperature, pressure, and state change). Typically, however (and I can't imagine a case where this didn't happen), the relations are social in character--and since social relations are subjective to the extent that all the social world is not expressly a fact, it can be difficult to differentiate between an illusion and a reality: people imagine their partners are cheating on them, whether or not its true. And there are many things we do not know about the social world around us; but, statistically speaking, nobody has ever actually been gang-stalked.
replies(1): >>44411446 #
overu589[dead post] ◴[] No.44411446[source]
[flagged]
andygeorge[dead post] ◴[] No.44413512[source]
[flagged]
1. dang ◴[] No.44416450[source]
Please don't post unsubstantive comments.
replies(1): >>44417703 #