←back to thread

Personal care products disrupt the human oxidation field

(www.science.org)
204 points XzetaU8 | 1 comments | 29 Jun 25 17:20 UTC | HN request time: 0.205s | source
Show context
parpfish ◴[29 Jun 25 17:55 UTC] No.44414983[source]▶
This won’t lead to people using less lotion, but it will lead to fancy lotions adding “OH precursors” as the new science buzzmarketing term
replies(1): >>44415029 #
AnotherGoodName ◴[29 Jun 25 18:02 UTC] No.44415029[source]▶
Which is funny since the exact opposite, anti-oxidants, have been a fad to add for the past 20years.
replies(2): >>44415202 #>>44415224 #
woleium ◴[29 Jun 25 18:28 UTC] No.44415224[source]▶
Antioxidant supplements provide no benefit, may even be harmful. See 2007 meta-analysis by Goran Bjelakovic, Dimitrinka Nikolova, Lars Gluud, Rosa G. Simonetti, and Christian Gluud, published in JAMA: “Mortality in Randomized Trials of Antioxidant Supplements for Primary and Secondary Prevention: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis”.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/20579...

replies(1): >>44416332 #
1. robocat ◴[29 Jun 25 20:52 UTC] No.44416332[source]▶
A meta-analysis is just a dilution of facts, in the exact proportion to have homeopathic efficacy.