←back to thread

204 points XzetaU8 | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
peanut_merchant ◴[] No.44414951[source]
Not well versed in the field, what are the basic implications of this for health?
replies(3): >>44414976 #>>44415003 #>>44415304 #
PaulHoule ◴[] No.44415003[source]
In the 1970s there was a lot of talk about ‘healthful negative ions’ and a fad for negative ion generators even though many of those also generated hazardous ozone.

Hydroxyl ions are a significant kind of negative ion in the atmosphere and they’re known to be good because they react with and clean out pollutants like methane

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydroxyl_radical

https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/144358/detergent-li...

replies(3): >>44415174 #>>44415293 #>>44415452 #
thaumasiotes ◴[] No.44415174[source]
How can something be a negative ion generator without simultaneously being a positive ion generator?
replies(2): >>44415219 #>>44417733 #
giantg2 ◴[] No.44415219[source]
.
replies(1): >>44415296 #
1. rpnx ◴[] No.44415296[source]
That isn't how chemistry works.
replies(1): >>44415457 #
2. wizzwizz4 ◴[] No.44415457[source]
Isosaccharinic acid has the same chemical formula (C6H12O6) as glucose, which isn't acidic. However, they both have the same net charge.
replies(1): >>44415516 #
3. xvedejas ◴[] No.44415516[source]
When something is an acid, it dissociates into both a positive ion H+ and negative ion (rest of the molecule)

HA ⇌ H+ + A-