←back to thread

204 points XzetaU8 | 5 comments | | HN request time: 1.255s | source
1. 12_throw_away ◴[] No.44415064[source]
Heh, is this bad ... who knows? Chemistry, environmental chemistry, and biochemistry are absurdly complex and full of interlocking Chesterton's Fences. But the profit motive means we don't really spend much time looking into them before tearing them down.
replies(1): >>44415161 #
2. EugeneOZ ◴[] No.44415161[source]
Actually it sounds kinda good.
replies(1): >>44415510 #
3. fwip ◴[] No.44415510[source]
Not sure why you got downvoted. The researchers state:

“If we buy a sofa from major furniture company, it’s tested for harmful emissions before being put on sale. However, when we sit on the sofa, we naturally transform some of these emissions because of the oxidation field we generate,” said lead author Jonathan Williams, who heads the study of organic reactive species at the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry. “This can create many additional compounds in our breathing zone whose properties are not well known or studied. Interestingly, body lotion and perfume both seem to dampen down this effect.”

Which, if you're worried about the effects of unstudied compounds, lotion will help protect you against.

replies(1): >>44415869 #
4. ricardobeat ◴[] No.44415869{3}[source]
That’s like saying diarrhea will protect you against ingesting unknown poisons. Disrupting natural processes rarely comes without unintended side effects.
replies(1): >>44416463 #
5. fwip ◴[] No.44416463{4}[source]
Sure, but it depends on what you consider to be "natural processes," and what you don't. The oxidation of sitting on a plastic^W vegan leather couch is not a "natural" process, but sitting on wood probably is. It's also not "natural" to be closed up with the results of that oxidation for most of the day, as most of our evolution happened with plenty of access to fresh air. We definitely have evidence that people were using oils and lotions for much longer than we've had modern synthetic materials or "air-tight" building methods.

The science is definitely still out, but I don't think it's unreasonable to think that inhibiting this reaction might be beneficial.