←back to thread

300 points pseudolus | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.634s | source
Show context
elevation ◴[] No.44410373[source]
I played in a cover band with some well-paid engineers. We enjoyed music enough to consider going full time, but even with four-figure bookings were were barely taking home minimum wage. We looked into getting a manager to find us more high-paying gigs, but management fees and travel costs eat up the gains.

For a band, it's virtually impossible to find work outside the weekend. If a region had a few restaurants that were known for year round "live music Mondays", "live music lunches", etc, it would increase the number of hours that a musician could work during the week, and make full time performance viable for more musicians. Of course, people would also need to support these performances by patronizing the venues that host them.

But until a working musician can fill their weekday calendar with paying gigs without excessive travel/lodging costs, you'll continue to see talented musicians drop out and do something else.

replies(4): >>44410449 #>>44410568 #>>44411752 #>>44412048 #
mettamage ◴[] No.44411752[source]
I've come to the perhaps grim conclusion that the world doesn't value music enough. It seems to me that most artists are making music because they love to do it themselves. It's essentially a form of play. Wanting a career out of it implies sacrifice in the way we currently have our world setup.

The current world we live in doesn't care enough about creativity. I find it a bleak thought, but here I am. Feel free to try to talk me out of it, because it does feel kind of depressing. Or feel free to validate it. I want to see the world for what it is, not what I like it to be.

replies(7): >>44412024 #>>44412346 #>>44413767 #>>44414492 #>>44414537 #>>44415375 #>>44421893 #
1. peab ◴[] No.44413767[source]
The music industry is a multi-billion dollar market and growing, so it's not really fair to say that the world doesn't value it.

The problem is that it's a bit of a winner takes all market. It's comparable to professional sports.

Everyone loves soccer, but 99.9% of people won't get paid to play it. That doesn't mean it isn't valued - some of the highest paid people in the world are soccer players!

replies(1): >>44416825 #
2. pydry ◴[] No.44416825[source]
It'd probably be a bit less winner-takes-all without the capitalist dynamics that make it such.
replies(2): >>44417754 #>>44423588 #
3. sien ◴[] No.44417754[source]
The technology plays a huge role.

Why watch local soccer in most of the world when you can watch the Champions League on the internet ?

In the Soviet Union people were watching Dynamo and Lokomotiv on TV rather than going to local games too.

4. peab ◴[] No.44423588[source]
I don't think the capitalist dynamic have as much of an impact as the technology and social factors.

Tech allows distribution, and the social factors is people want to listen to what's popular