←back to thread

262 points Anon84 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.252s | source
1. Mistletoe ◴[] No.44413170[source]
> Let’s say schizophrenia is associated with a 50% loss of reproductive fitness in 1% of the population (and there is no offsetting benefit in the rest of the population), then it would take roughly 180 generations to cut the rate in half and about 560 generations to reduce it to one-tenth of its original value (Mitteroecker & Merola, 2024). We’ve had a comparable number of generations since the Neolithic era, but as far as we know, the prevalence of schizophrenia has not decreased in the manner anticipated.

What if the number we experience now IS 1/10 of what it used to be? Would explain a lot of religious talking to God in the past.