←back to thread

300 points pseudolus | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
Projectiboga ◴[] No.44409650[source]
What has been developing for awhile is that musicians are coming from richer backgrounds on average. They can dally around trying their hand as a working musician and can fail and not be destitute. The age of a working class or lower class musician is waining.
replies(6): >>44410088 #>>44410270 #>>44410787 #>>44410965 #>>44412091 #>>44415903 #
monero-xmr ◴[] No.44410270[source]
Successful musicians have way more in common with actors than any other profession. It’s about connections, wealth, and nepotism over anything else.

Let’s say your child wants to be an actor. One way to make this happen is to be a successful actor yourself - require your children to be cast in the film in return for you starring. This is how famous acting families pushed their kids forwards, including Nicholas Cage (Coppola) and Jeff Bridges.

More relevant for HN is rich people. So you are tech rich and your kid wants to act. Fund the movie on the condition your child acts in it. That is the way since movies began.

replies(3): >>44410804 #>>44410852 #>>44411318 #
bitmasher9 ◴[] No.44410804[source]
> Fund the movie on the condition your child acts in it.

The customer of such a movie isn’t the audience but the wealthy patron sponsoring the movie. I suspect this self-promotion motivation is a large reason why so many movies are so bad.

replies(2): >>44410879 #>>44411325 #
1. dsign ◴[] No.44411325[source]
So many movies are bad because their customer is, intellectually, the minimum common denominator. It's a miracle that movie plots don't consist entirely of grunts, chest pumping and farts, but we are getting closer and closer every year. Most block-busters have an awful lot of primal violence in them, but I bet you can't remember when was the last time any of them had any accurate, actual science.