←back to thread

300 points pseudolus | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
parpfish ◴[] No.44408859[source]
How many financially self-sustaining musicians should there be? Streaming has caused the number to fall, but recorded music before that likely made it fall as well.

Should we stop thinking about music as a job and start thinking about it as a hobbyist art form? Nobody is out there lamenting that you can’t make a living off of landscape painting. It’s a fun form of self expression that people will do regardless of the economics, so maybe the problem was ever thinking you could make a profession out of it?

replies(22): >>44408928 #>>44408966 #>>44409045 #>>44409157 #>>44409254 #>>44409270 #>>44409551 #>>44409842 #>>44409919 #>>44410084 #>>44410086 #>>44410122 #>>44410201 #>>44410210 #>>44410229 #>>44410260 #>>44410292 #>>44410623 #>>44410719 #>>44411539 #>>44412762 #>>44421135 #
lapcat ◴[] No.44409157[source]
The question we should be asking, as consumers of music, is how many musical options do we want?

If musicians can't make a living, then both the quantity and quality of our musical options go down. Yes, hobbyists will always make music for themselves, but hobbyists won't necessarily record music for us or tour around the country for us to see in live venues. The issue is not that musicians inherently deserve to make a living; the issue is, what kind of musical market is available for consumers?

replies(1): >>44409468 #
DennisP ◴[] No.44409468[source]
Plenty of hobbyists record their music. A lot of the music I listen to is from youtubers with a handful of views.
replies(2): >>44409573 #>>44410168 #
megaloblasto ◴[] No.44410168[source]
Can you recommend a YouTuber with a hand full of views that you think is a good musician?
replies(4): >>44410204 #>>44410241 #>>44411768 #>>44415511 #
1. derektank ◴[] No.44410241[source]
I'm not sure if they're more popular on other media platforms, but I've really enjoyed quite a few songs by the Japanese band Ribettowns and their YouTube account has less than 1K subscribers
replies(1): >>44414124 #
2. megaloblasto ◴[] No.44414124[source]
That was sick. I watched one will less than 1000 views and it was amazing. How'd you find them?
replies(1): >>44441336 #
3. derektank ◴[] No.44441336[source]
Genuinely no idea. Possibly on a Spotify playlist years ago. Serendipity and the wills of the algorithm I guess