←back to thread

156 points rntn | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.207s | source | bottom
Show context
ronsor ◴[] No.44407371[source]
Copyright is finally being deprecated as it should be.

I'm still waiting for an update on the final removal timeline.

replies(6): >>44407662 #>>44407723 #>>44407860 #>>44407930 #>>44407946 #>>44408857 #
__loam ◴[] No.44407860[source]
Software engineers and tech workers will make their living off producing IP then say shit like this.
replies(2): >>44407995 #>>44408840 #
1. idle_zealot ◴[] No.44407995[source]
> You criticize society and yet you participate in it. How curious.
replies(3): >>44408245 #>>44408716 #>>44409208 #
2. coderatlarge ◴[] No.44408245[source]
without siding with the perspective being voiced, i feel compelled to point out your comment sounds like you believe there is a real alternative to criticize yet participate. even if you attempt to disengage and decide to go live in a cabin in the woods off the grid, the irs and any number of other agencies will go after you and your loved ones for doing basic human things like having and raising kids in a non-sanctioned way. so is there really any practical alternative to just voicing dissent?
replies(1): >>44410175 #
3. __loam ◴[] No.44408716[source]
The alternative is corporations stealing your work with no recourse.
4. johnnyanmac ◴[] No.44409208[source]
It's more like "you criticize society, but vote for its destruction". It's fine having those views, but it's "curious" how those same views go against the incentive structure for making new technology.

That can be understandable in other communities with diehard FOSS folk. But this place is a a startup incubator. Clearly appealing more to the entrepreneurial side of industry.

5. Dylan16807 ◴[] No.44410175[source]
> your comment sounds like you believe there is a real alternative to criticize yet participate

You have this exactly backwards. That belief is in a quote. idle_zealot is attributing that bad opinion to __loam, as a kind of paraphrasing.

replies(1): >>44410823 #
6. coderatlarge ◴[] No.44410823{3}[source]
thank you for explaining and sorry i totally missed the reference…